🔗 Share this article

Perhaps some of the most famous photographs from modern history portrays a nude young girl, her arms outstretched, her expression twisted in pain, her body scorched and flaking. She can be seen fleeing toward the camera after fleeing an airstrike during the Vietnam War. Nearby, other children are racing from the bombed hamlet of the region, against a scene of thick fumes and military personnel.

This Worldwide Influence of a Seminal Photograph

Just after the publication in June 1972, this image—officially named "Napalm Girl"—evolved into a traditional phenomenon. Witnessed and discussed by millions, it has been broadly attributed for galvanizing public opinion against the American involvement during that era. One noted thinker afterwards remarked how this horrifically indelible photograph featuring nine-year-old Kim Phúc suffering likely was more effective to increase public revulsion against the war than lengthy broadcasts of broadcast violence. A legendary English documentarian who documented the conflict described it the most powerful image of what would later be called the televised conflict. A different veteran war journalist remarked how the picture is simply put, among the most significant photographs ever made, specifically of that era.

A Long-Standing Attribution and a Recent Assertion

For over five decades, the image was attributed to the work of Nick Út, a young South Vietnamese photographer employed by an international outlet during the war. However a provocative recent documentary streaming on a streaming service claims that the iconic photograph—widely regarded to be the apex of photojournalism—was actually shot by another person present that day in the village.

As claimed by the film, "Napalm Girl" was in fact photographed by a freelancer, who sold the images to the AP. The assertion, and its following research, originates with a former editor Carl Robinson, who claims that a influential editor directed him to change the image’s credit from the stringer to the staff photographer, the only AP staff photographer on site that day.

The Quest for the Truth

Robinson, now in his 80s, reached out to a filmmaker a few years ago, seeking help in finding the uncredited photographer. He expressed that, should he still be alive, he wanted to offer an apology. The journalist reflected on the unsupported photojournalists he had met—likening them to current independents, similar to independent journalists in that era, are routinely marginalized. Their efforts is commonly questioned, and they operate under much more difficult conditions. They lack insurance, no retirement plans, they don’t have support, they frequently lack proper gear, and they are incredibly vulnerable while photographing within their homeland.

The filmmaker pondered: How would it feel to be the man who made this image, if in fact he was not the author?” From a photographic perspective, he imagined, it could be deeply distressing. As a follower of photojournalism, particularly the celebrated combat images of Vietnam, it would be reputation-threatening, possibly legacy-altering. The hallowed history of the image in the diaspora meant that the filmmaker whose parents emigrated during the war felt unsure to pursue the investigation. He expressed, “I didn’t want to disrupt the accepted account that Nick had taken the photograph. I also feared to disrupt the current understanding among a group that had long admired this achievement.”

The Investigation Unfolds

Yet the two the investigator and his collaborator felt: it was worth asking the question. As members of the press are to keep the world accountable,” noted the journalist, we must are willing to ask difficult questions about our own field.”

The film documents the investigators as they pursue their own investigation, from testimonies from observers, to public appeals in present-day Saigon, to archival research from other footage taken that day. Their efforts finally produce a candidate: a freelancer, employed by a news network during the attack who occasionally sold photographs to foreign agencies as a freelancer. In the film, a moved the claimant, currently advanced in age based in California, claims that he handed over the photograph to the AP for minimal payment with a physical photo, yet remained plagued by the lack of credit for years.

The Response Followed by Further Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the footage, thoughtful and reflective, yet his account became controversial within the field of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to